{"id":18603,"date":"2026-02-05T07:08:46","date_gmt":"2026-02-04T23:08:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/?p=18603"},"modified":"2026-02-05T07:08:46","modified_gmt":"2026-02-04T23:08:46","slug":"house-suspends-barzaga-for-another-60-days","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/2026\/02\/05\/house-suspends-barzaga-for-another-60-days\/","title":{"rendered":"HOUSE SUSPENDS BARZAGA FOR ANOTHER 60 DAYS"},"content":{"rendered":"

THE House of Representatives on Tuesday voted 238-10 with nine abstentions to adopt the recommendation of the Committee on Ethics and Privileges imposing another 60-day suspension without pay on Cavite 4th district Rep. Francisco \u201cKiko\u201d Barzaga for repeated and escalating misconduct. <\/strong><\/p>\n

The suspension stemmed from findings that Barzaga committed fresh violations of House rules while serving a prior suspension, in defiance of a stern warning issued by the chamber. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Committee chair 4Ps Party-list Rep. JC Abalos said the panel found substantial evidence that Barzaga violated Section 141, Rule 20 of the Rules of the House by continuing to post malicious and defamatory content on social media from December 1, 2025 to January 30, 2026. <\/strong><\/p>\n

The new penalty arose from a privileged speech and complaint filed by Manila Rep. Rolando Valeriano, who alleged that Barzaga openly defied House authority by repeating\u2014and intensifying\u2014the same disorderly conduct for which he had already been sanctioned. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Valeriano cited Barzaga\u2019s social media posts accusing fellow lawmakers of receiving bribes from tycoon Enrique Razon in exchange for political support, allegations the committee found to be reckless, defamatory and unsupported. The complaint also pointed to posts vilifying the late Antipolo City Rep. Romeo Acop. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Abalos said the committee considered the attacks on a deceased colleague especially reprehensible and incompatible with the dignity and restraint expected of a member of Congress. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThis constitutes a deliberate and reasoned defiance of the authority of the House and its disciplinary process,\u201d Abalos said in sponsoring the report. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Barzaga was earlier suspended for 60 days after the House adopted Committee Report No. 28 on December 1, 2025, which found him liable for disorderly behavior, including posting incendiary content and retaining publicly viewable inappropriate and indecent material in violation of Section 141A, Rule 20 of the House Rules and Republic Act No. 6713. <\/strong><\/p>\n

The report carried a clear warning that any repetition of similar misconduct would merit more severe sanctions. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Despite the warning, the committee found that Barzaga continued and escalated the same conduct during the suspension period, using social media accounts identifying him as a sitting congressman. <\/strong><\/p>\n

The House plenary directed the committee to assess Barzaga\u2019s conduct during the suspension, after which the panel treated the new acts as a continuation of prior misconduct, not a separate case. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Abalos said Barzaga ignored formal notices to appear before the committee and publicly declared that he would not attend the ethics hearing, leading the panel to declare him in default. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Committee will not tolerate conduct that brings itself and the entire House into disgrace and contempt,\u201d Abalos said. <\/strong><\/p>\n

With the plenary\u2019s adoption of the report, Barzaga will again be suspended for 60 days without salaries and allowances. <\/strong><\/p>\n

The penalty carries a stern warning that any further repetition of similar misconduct could warrant harsher sanctions, including expulsion from office, under House rules. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

THE House of Representatives on Tuesday voted 238-10 with nine abstentions to adopt the recommendation of the Committee on Ethics and Privileges imposing another 60-day<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":18604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,17],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18603"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18603"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18603\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18605,"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18603\/revisions\/18605"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journaldailynewsonline.com.ph\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}