IF such a situation arises, Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson is prepared to oppose and vote against any motion to stop or delay the Senate’s convening as an impeachment court for the possible case of Vice President Sara Duterte-Carpio.
Lacson also stressed that the Constitution and its legal mechanisms are in place to address any possible issues related to a potential impeachment trial, including moves to block the Senate from convening as an impeachment court.
“For context, I did not say I will not oppose and vote against any motion to stop or delay the convening of the Senate into an impeachment court, if it comes to that. That said, the Senate is a collegial, deliberative body that is always ruled by the vote of the majority,” he said in a post on X.
“If this constitutional issue arises, the Supreme Court may intervene to compel the Senate to perform our constitutional duty,” he added.
Lacson also made it clear that opposing the motion to stop or delay the Senate from convening as an impeachment court should not be interpreted as a vote to convict or acquit – but as an assertion of the Senate’s constitutional duty to convene as such.
He reiterated that the evidence will be his guide in deciding whether to convict or acquit, should the impeachment trial push through.
“This position to oppose any attempt to block the convening of the Senate as an impeachment court has nothing to do with my decision to convict or acquit the respondent as I will always be guided by the evidence to be presented and nothing else,” he stressed.
At the Kapihan sa Senado last May 6, Lacson pointed out that senators must be prepared to address possible issues surrounding the impeachment process, including a hypothetical situation where a motion is raised to stop the Senate from convening as an impeachment court and the matter is put to a vote.
He noted that such an issue could reach the Supreme Court, as conducting the impeachment trial is a constitutional duty of the Senate.
“Constitutional duty yan. (The ones who move to stop the convening into an impeachment court) must be able to convince the majority to vote in their favor (The impeachment trial is a constitutional duty. The ones who move to stop the convening into an impeachment court must be able to convince the majority to vote in their favor),” he said.
“Kung ganoon ang mangyari, it’s on them. Sila ang sumagot sa taumbayan kung bakit ayaw mag-convene ,” he added.

ASEAN LEADERS DISCUSS DEVELOPING REGIONAL FUEL RESERVE – PRESIDENT MARCOS
RETURN OF P60-B PHILHEALTH FUNDS VICTORY FOR HEALTH AND PEOPLE – SEN. PIA
SSS, GSIS URGED TO EXTEND LOANS FOR MEMBERS TO ACQUIRE E-VEHICLES
TROPICAL STORM ‘HAGUPIT’ INTENSIFIES, TO ENTER PAR SATURDAY
ASEAN OKAYS MARITIME CENTRE IN PH TO ENSURE FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA – MARCOS
7 PINOY SEAMEN HURT IN IRAN DRONE ATTACK IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ — DFA
LACSON TO OPPOSE MOTIONS TO BLOCK CONVENING OF SENATE AS IMPEACHMENT COURT